Minggu, 21 Juni 2009

Greenfire Reveals New Design for Geer Building Site that Retains Historic Storefronts

Talk of Greenfire's new design for the Geer Building site has been swirling around downtown for about a month now, but Kevin has posted renderings on the new design on his site. You can read more details about the development at his site.

Kudos to Greenfire for rethinking plans to demolish 120-122 West Main St. and 119 Parrish St. to build a large office tower. The new renderings show that at least the facades of the buildings appear to have been retained, and the street-level mass of these buildings is extended to the west by new 'storefront' construction. Thus the architectural fabric of downtown Durham is reinforced, rather than further diminished.


Looking northeast from Corcoran and West Main.
(Courtesy Bull City Rising)


Looking southeast from Corcoran between W. Parrish and E Chapel Hill.
(Courtesy Bull City Rising)


Looking southeast at the 100 West Parrish St. storefronts from W. Parrish and Corcoran.
(Courtesy Bull City Rising)

It's always very hard to tell with these multi-angled modernist structures how they are going to 'fit' based on the renderings. I'm impressed with the general plan, though - create urban height and mass, while also paying very close attention to the pedestrian-scale form and activity.

I'm struck, actually, how much it reminds me of a modern form of the Washington Duke Hotel, once one of Durham's signature architectural buildings that stood diagonally opposite the location of this new structure across the West Parrish and Corcoran intersection. (The original design of that building, anyway - the 60s saw an unfortunate bricking-in of the base of the building, eliminating the storefronts.) I'm impressed by the marriage of 'what works' with a creative aesthetic in a form that echos Durham's own architectural history.

I somewhat doubt that they will retain the entirety of the 120-122 West Main and 119 West Parrish buildings. To an extent, it becomes an exercise in futility to fight over the middle-of-the-block masonry of a structure gutted by fire. I do think 122 West Main is in better shape than the other contiguous structure, and I hope they'll be able to retain some of the original architectural elements. Given the condition and the persistent teetering-on-the-edge-of-demolition with these structures, if we can retain/repair the facades and a decent portion of the remainder of the building, I'm frankly relieved.

While I could quibble with aspects of the design that wouldn't be my preference, I think the rendering shows a very impressive balance between what Greenfire needs to build in order to attract tenants, historic preservation concerns, and urban planning/streetscape concerns. If anyone actually thought that my objections to Greenfire's previous plans had something to do with my day job, it didn't; this is the kind of change I was hoping for. I very much hope they succeed with this.

Find this spot on a Google Map


35.995793,-78.901425

Kamis, 18 Juni 2009

PINHOOK / CASWELL HILL / CASWELL HEIGHTS

The genesis of Durham as a town is most inextricably linked to the existence of the NW-SE ridgeline that runs through the Piedmont, separating the Cape Fear and Neuse River basins. As I've written about previously, this ridgeline is a natural transportation corridor, and settlement along the corridor was therefore no accident.

Within later-Durham's immediate sphere, Hillsborough and Raleigh were, by the 18th century, the established towns along the roadway that followed the ridgeline. This roadway was, not suprisingly, called the Hillsborough Road, the Raleigh Road, or the Raleigh-Hillsborough Road (or vice-versa) in this area. Journeys were not quick along these roadways, riding, walking, or being pulled by horses. There were, of course, scattered settlement and farms along the roadway, and such farmers could enjoy easier access to markets than those more distant from the main road. Other establishments for the itinerant traveller popped up along the roadway as well; I like to call these 18th/19th century 'truck stops'.

If that term has a somewhat pejorative ring to it, that's intentional. Perhaps long journeys just don't sit well with most folks, particularly if they are alone (or at least on 'business trips') but the seamier side of such places on the side of the highway today - that how-soon-can-I-wash-my-hands feel - is nothing new.

These settlements predated Durham (not the existence of a few stores and homes at the later site of Durham station, but Durham as city.) One well known 'truck stop' was Prattsburg, which I've previously written about. Located on the east side of later-Durham station, Prattsburg was well known for the main forms of vice available - drinking, fighting, gambling, and prostitution - not necessarily in that order. It also had more practical (depending on your point of view, I suppose) services, such as a blacksmith shop, store, cotton gin, etc. William Pratt, the owner, had the place in fine form by the 1830s.

Pratt also owned land west of later-Durham Station. Another, similar settlement was established here by the early 1800s, and named Pinhook. As a Trinity College historian so eloquently put it in a 1906 history that mentions Pinhook: "some questionable characters kept a resort there, and nearby there was a grog shop." The area contained a campground, a well, and grove of trees to rest horses in the shade as well as the gambling, fighting, and prostitution that seemed to be prerequisite. After Pratt, this land passed into the hands of William Turner, who held a license to dispense spirits at Pinhook in 1850, and eventually (by the time of the railroad survey) Andrew Copley. Jean Anderson surmises that Pratt was the likely originator of Pinhook, though, given his other associations with tawdriness.

Helpful to the business of Pinhook was also the establishment of the state university ~15 miles to the southwest. College students have changed less over the course of the past ~150 years than one might imagine.

A story related in history collected by Duke professor John Spencer Bassett is a small news item that ran in the Hillsborough Recorder in 1871, without additional explanation:


Scan from the original Hillsborough Recorder, 1871.
(Courtesy of David Southern)

Exactly locating Pinhook is a fun endeavor, and the kind of thing that Durham history geeks like me like to debate. The best representation of the location of Pinhook is given by the North Carolina railroad survey map, drawn in 1850. A beautiful set of large maps, located in the state archives, they document the charted course of the planned railroad, including land owners and settlement on or proximate to the right-of-way. While descriptions state that Pinhook was located "100 yards southwest from the corner of the Erwin Mill" the survey maps likely show it with the most accuracy.


Overlay of the RR survey map on present-day satellite photography, matching the centerline of the right-of-way to the curve of the railroad track.
(Picture of the survey provided by Steve Rankin)

Pinhook's days had probably begun to wane by the 1880s, as the railroad running through the middle of the settlement likely reduced traffic on the roadway considerably, and seemingly split it in two. Mercantile needs, as well as a need for spirits, would increasingly be met near the stations, as the early growth of saloons near Durham Station would attest. Also, increasing settlement from the growth of Durham brought increased attention that made it more difficult to carry on in isolation.

It seems that Pinhook had already begun to be supplanted by houses of some 'significance' by that time, as an 1887 map shows settlement along the south side of the railroad tracks.


Residents along what would be known as Railroad Street, eventually West Pettigrew, 1887
(Courtesy University of North Carolina)

Many of these people were associated with industry in Durham, such as JW Swift, a "tobacco buyer" who worked on Roney St., JA Long a foreman at the Duke Tobacco Factory, Dr. JL Watkins, a "leaf dealer" who worked on Morris St. JW Brooks is listed as a real estate agent in 1889, which makes me wonder if he was somehow involved in the 'gentrification' of Pinhook. Brookstown would be named after him, although I don't know his relationship to that African-American settlement to the southeast.

By 1892, Brooks is listed as a "plug dealer for Alliance Plug Factory" (plug was a type of tobacco) and as a resident of Caswell Hill. I do not know the origin of the name, but given that it is sometimes referred to as "Casewell Hill" (or Heights) and there is a Case Street, I assume that the name was somehow derived from a Mr/Ms Case, who I have not tracked down. However, all of the residents of this area are referred to as living in Caswell Hill by that year.

If there were any remnants of Pinhook by that time, the finality came when Ben Duke, George Watts, and William Erwin practiced the 1890s version of urban renewal (although they actually built something) acquiring large tracts of land for the construction of Erwin Cotton Mill and the surrounding village. By the time the original mill was constructed in 1893, and expanded in 1898, there was clearly no further evidence of Pinhook. Interestingly, Julian Carr would repeat this same pattern as he flattened Smoky Hollow to create Edgemont/Morning Glory (and Durham Hosiery Mill No.1 & Golden Belt) in 1901.


Site of Pinhook, looking north across the railroad tracks. The housing noted above was behind and to the right of the photographer.
(Courtesy Old West Durham)

With the construction of the Erwin Mill, Caswell Hill became part of the mill village, housing supervisors, owners and the like. Brooks and Swift seem to have disappeared by the late 1890s, although the 1910 map below still shows Brooks' name. It also shows that these houses were increasingly acquired by Erwin Mills to provide housing for employees. The area associated with Pinhook on the north side of the road/railroad was eventually redeveloped as part of Mill No. 4, built in 1909.


Caswell Hill, 1910. Houses owned by Erwin Mill are white, others are shaded.
(Courtesy Duke RBMC - digitized by Digital Durham)

Occupants of the specific houses on the south side of the tracks are difficult to track down prior to 1925, but a rather scattershot accounting of occupants from the late 1920s, late 1930s, and mid 1950s, living between the Erwin Auditorium and 14th (Rutherford) Street:

1709 West Pettigrew: Parks, PB; Byers, Walton V; Cooke, Robert
1715 West Pettigrew: Blacknall, JC Mrs.; Parks, Paul B; Byers, Walton V..
1801 West Pettigrew: Ward, WP; Blacknall, Josephine; Benson, Dwight M
1805 West Pettigrew: Poe, CT; Same; Same
1807 West Pettigrew: Cable, LB; Bunting Carl L; Woodruff, Percy and Hitt, Marlin
1811 West Pettigrew: Cooke, NA Mrs.; Gery, Delma; Jones, Thos.
1815 West Pettigrew: Hawes, AD; Heldman, Jas; Smart, Oscar
1819 West Pettigrew: Agner, AL; Agner, Adam; Nash, Chas E
1823 West Pettigrew: Byrd, WT; Same; Wiley William T
1825 West Pettigrew:Reese, AM; Faris, Aubry; Sam


A partial view of the houses along West Pettigrew Street, terminating in Erwin Auditorium (to be profiled next week), 1950s
(Courtesy Herald Sun)

It isn't clear when these houses were torn down, but they were certainly down by 1984, when demolition along West Pettigrew Street occurred in advance of the construction of the Erwin->15-501 leg of the Durham Freeway.

The below 1989 shot of the construction of Erwin Square shows the cleared land on the south side of the railroad tracks.


Looking north at the construction of Erwin Square, 02.01.89
(Courtesy Herald Sun)

Today, the location of Pinhook would sit around the roundabout entrance to Erwin Square, and in the no-man's-land between the railroad and the Durham Freeway - a desolate evolution for a place that once hosted such boisterous behavior.


Site of Pinhook, 06.13.09

I'm happy to report that the name has been rejuvenated in the form of a great little bar that opened last fall - not at Pinhook proper (as if it ever was) but at 119 West Main Street.

Find this spot on a Google Map.


36.006728,-78.925253

Rabu, 17 Juni 2009

Mystery Photo - 06.18.09


"Corner store at 11pm, Durham NC" - May, 1940.
From the Library of Congress - Farm Service Administration photo by Jack Delano.

As a side note, there are some great Durham photographs in the Library of Congress, particularly revolving around the tobacco auctions in downtown Durham, but also some wonderful shots of downtown 1936-1940. The digital quality of these available online is miserable, as you can see above. Unfortunately, the Library of Congress seems to charge $22 per scan if you'd like to order something better. If anyone has experience with a cheaper solution worked out with the LOC / knows how to fund such an endeavor (there are probably about 300 photos in total) let me know.

And a good opportunity to repeat my digitization mantra - if you have the rare opportunity to access your Great Aunt Lizzie's picture of the family homestead in 1893, crank up the dpi!! I can never understand why people (including libraries) are scanning photos at 300 dpi or worse in these days of $150 1.5 terabyte hard drives. The hard part is getting access to the photo - scan high, scan often.